Evidence Hub

A non-cephalometric three-dimensional appraisal of soft tissue changes by functional appliances in orthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Luyten J, Vierendeel M, De Roo NMC, Temmerman L, De Pauw GAM

European journal of orthodontics, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with dental and skeletal Class II growth patterns present typical facial characteristics. Functional appliance (FA) therapy is one of the conventional orthodontic treatment modalities used to harmonize these facial imbalances.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate and summarize the effects of FAs on the facial soft tissues captured in three dimensions.

SEARCH METHODS: A systematic search was conducted up to December 2020. Databases Medline (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched without language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trial (RCT)'s investigating the influence of FA therapy on the facial soft tissues in a non-cephalometric and three-dimensional (3D) manner, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction was independently undertaken by two authors. In case of conflict, a third author was consulted. RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed for total facial height, upper lip length, lower lip length, commissural width, and facial depth. The single-step activation versus incremental approach was compared using a random effects model.

RESULTS: Five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis of the systematic review. Facial height increased after FA therapy. Three studies met the criteria for the meta-analysis. The mean facial depth increased significantly (P < 0.003) with 1.39 mm (0.46 to 2.32).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free