Evidence Hub

Pharmacologic Modulation of Circadian Rhythms for Delirium Prevention: An Age-Stratified Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

de Oliveira HM, Gallo Ruelas M, Parker T, Diaz CAV, Oliveira de Paula G, Zamora FV, Fruett da Costa PR

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026

7,845 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disturbances in sleep-wake homeostasis (Process S) and circadian rhythm (Process C) are common precipitants of delirium, especially among older hospitalized adults. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to test whether four sleep-modulation agents-melatonin, ramelteon, suvorexant, and lemborexant-lower delirium incidence or shorten its duration in hospitalized patients, with stratified analyses by drug class, age, and surgical status.

METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL through March 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing delirium prevention with melatonin, ramelteon, suvorexant, and lemborexant in hospitalized adults (≥ 18 years), compared to placebo or standard care. Data synthesis was performed separately for RCTs and observational studies using random-effects models. Meta-regression was used to explore effect modifiers. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2/ROBINS-I tools. Certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE assessment.

RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies (27 RCTs, 10 observational) comprising 7845 patients were included. Among RCTs, melatonin (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.72-1.22) and ramelteon (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.39-1.03) showed no significant effect on delirium incidence, whereas orexin receptor antagonists were associated with a lower risk (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.87). Evidence for a class difference was inconsistent across analytic approaches: a subgroup heterogeneity…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,845 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free