Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Serotonin-Dopamine Activity Modulators in Major Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Mishra A, Sarangi SC, Maiti R, Sood M, Reeta KH

Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022

Abstract

Serotonin-dopamine activity modulators (SDAMs) have been approved as an adjunctive treatment to antidepressants in patients with inadequate response. These drugs have been proposed to have a beneficial effect on cognition, sleep-related problems, and other affective symptoms in patients with depression. Previous studies have shown inconsistent evidence and have not reported a pooled effect of the 2 drugs of this class: aripiprazole and brexpiprazole. This meta-analysis evaluated the effect of augmentation with SDAM drugs in patients with major depression. The meta-analysis protocol was made as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol guidelines and registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Clinical Trial registry, and EudraCT databases were searched with prespecified search terms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the meta package in R software. Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model analysis observed a pooled effect of 1.55 (95%CI, 1.32-1.84; prediction interval, 0.95-2.55, z = 5.19 [P < .0001]) for remission between the SDAM and placebo groups. A pooled effect of 1.58 (95%CI, 1.37-1.83; prediction interval, 1.00-2.51, z = 6.34 [P < .0001]) for adverse events and 0.72 (95%CI, 0.48-1.08; prediction interval, 0.46-1.12; z = -1.58 [P = .113]) for serious adverse events was observed. No significant publication bias…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free