Evidence Hub

Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Dyspepsia: A Korean Expert Review With Original Meta-analyses

Seo SI, Lee SP, Shin CM, Cho YK, Kim JH, Oh JH, Park MI, Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology Motility

Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026

Abstract

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as a potent alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia (FD). This narrative review incorporating original meta-analyses summarizes the latest evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, emphasizing the efficacy, safety, and clinical applications of P-CABs such as vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, keverprazan, and zastaprazan. P-CABs demonstrate rapid onset, sustained acid suppression, and superior healing rates in erosive esophagitis (EE), particularly in severe EE (grade C/D). Maintenance therapy in healed EE with P-CABs also yields higher endoscopic remission rates compared to PPIs. In non-erosive reflux disease, P-CABs offer rapid and sustained symptom control compared with placebo. Their pharmacologic profiles, including flexible dosing and rapid action, support on-demand therapy, potentially enhancing patient satisfaction. In addition, P-CABs may help overcome unmet needs from suboptimal efficacy of PPIs in nocturnal heartburn and extraesophageal symptoms. Emerging economic evaluation suggests P-CABs may be cost-effective in Asian healthcare systems. In FD, tegoprazan offers effective symptom relief without delaying gastric emptying, distinguishing it from PPIs. Limited clinical and real-world data indicate that second-generation P-CABs do not exhibit significant hepatotoxicity, however, long-term hypergastrinemia…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free