Evidence Hub

Adjuvant aspirin for colorectal cancer with PIK3CA-mutated and COX-2 overexpressed tumours: the ASCOLT translational research study and meta-analysis

Segelov E, Li S, Li I, Mouradov D, Yip S, Day D, Jeffery M, Zielinski R et al.

EBioMedicine, 2026

1,587 participants

Abstract

Background: ASCOLT compared adjuvant aspirin versus (vs) placebo in 1587 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and reported no significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS). Subsequently, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported benefit of adjuvant aspirin in CRC patients with somatic PI3K-related mutations.

Methods: The ASCOLT Translational Research (TR) study was a preplanned subgroup analysis by PIK3CA mutation status and COX-2 overexpression, and an exploratory analysis including PTEN mutation status. Among 778 participants who commenced study medication, tissue was evaluable for targeted next generation sequencing of PIK3CA and PTEN in 289 tumours and by Sanger sequencing for PIK3CA exon 9 or 20 (9/20) mutations in a further 108. PTGS2/COX-2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 450. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DFS of aspirin vs placebo in subgroups were assessed in Cox models. A systematic review of completed RCTs of adjuvant aspirin in CRC patients with PIK3CA mutations was also undertaken.

Registration: NCT00565708 and ACTRN12614000513617.

Findings: Among 397 patients with tumour assessable for PIK3CA, there were 80 recurrences, 40 deaths and 86 DFS events after 5 years follow-up. Among 69 (17%) with PIK3CA mutations (any exon), there were 8 vs 8 DFS events on placebo vs aspirin (HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.35-2.47); in 45 (11%) with exon 9/20 mutations, 7 vs 4 events (HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.21-2.46) and in 84 (21%) with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,587 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free