Evidence Hub

Reshaping the Battlefield: Reprogramming the Melanoma Tumour Microenvironment (TME) by Anti-CTLA-4, Anti-PD-1, and Anti-PD-L1 Monotherapy and Combination Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence

Karakousis VA, Mantalovas S, Karakousi VC, Vizirianakis IS, Papamitsou T, Pavlidis L, Kosmidis CS

Cells, 2026

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), comprising anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), have transformed melanoma therapy, yet the tumour microenvironment (TME), the pivotal biological interface where therapeutic efficacy, resistance, and toxicity are determined, remains incompletely characterized. This dual systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420261374242) followed PRISMA 2020 and included 58 preclinical (B16F10/C57BL/6; 46 quantitative) and 44 clinical studies (19 quantitative) to calculate pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for six intratumoral TME parameters. Checkpoint blockade consistently shifted the TME toward an immune-activated state, an effect that remained robust in sensitivity analyses despite substantial heterogeneity (I-squared heterogeneity statistic (I2) = 68-88%). Preclinically, ICIs significantly increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration (SMD = 1.45, p p p = 0.005), and apoptosis (SMD = 3.54, p p = 0.004) and Ki-67 (SMD = -1.43, p = 0.028). Clinically, CD8+ infiltration and PD-L1 both increased (SMD = 0.72, p p = 0.001), contrasting with the preclinical PD-L1 decrease. Meta-regression demonstrated superior anti-PD-L1 efficacy over CTLA-4 for effector parameters: IFN-γ +3.59 (p = 0.009), CD8/Treg +10.69 (p = 0.003), apoptosis +9.76 (p = 0.004), and Ki-67 -6.28 (p = 0.040). These findings establish the TME as a critical determinant of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free