Evidence Hub

Long-term use of dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Araujo LMM, Sousa AD, Vieira CC, Abreu JPP, Conti CF, Silva MML, Oliveira MM

Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026

3,546 participants

Abstract

Background: Insomnia is a prevalent disorder associated with impaired daytime functioning and reduced quality of life. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) have shown favorable short-term efficacy and safety profiles. However, evidence regarding their long-term (≥ 6 months) effects remains limited.

Objective: To synthesize the available evidence on prolonged DORA use in adults with chronic insomnia.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Adults with primary insomnia treated with DORAs (suvorexant, lemborexant, or daridorexant) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ≥ 6 months were included. The outcomes included patient-reported sleep parameters, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation.

Results: We included 6 randomized controlled trials comprising 3,546 participants. After 6 and 12 months, DORAs improved subjective sleep parameters of efficacy. Overall, DORAs showed adverse events similar to those of placebo at 6 months, but higher rates at 12 months. The overall rate of discontinuation due to adverse events did not differ significantly, although higher doses of certain DORAs increased the discontinuation rate at 6 months.

Conclusion: In chronic insomnia, DORAs provide sustained improvements in key subjective sleep outcomes, with overall acceptable safety and tolerability profiles. Higher doses may be less well tolerated. Additional long-term randomized trials are needed to better…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,546 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free