Evidence Hub

Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and network meta‐analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants

Henock G. Yebyo, H. Aschmann, M. Kaufmann, M. Puhan

American Heart Journal, 2019

153 citations

Abstract

Background: The current guidelines of statins for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention were based on results from systematic reviews and meta‐analyses that suffer from limitations. Methods: We searched in PubMed for existing systematic reviews and individual open‐label or double‐blinded randomized controlled trials that compared a statin with a placebo or another, which were published in English until January 01, 2018. We performed a random‐effect pairwise meta‐analysis of all statins as a class and network meta‐analysis for the specific statins on different benefit and harm outcomes. Results: In the pairwise meta‐analyses, statins as a class showed statistically significant risk reductions on non‐fatal MI (risk ratio [RR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.53–0.72), CVD mortality (RR 0.80, 0.71–0.91), all‐cause mortality (RR 0.89, 0.85–0.93), non‐fatal stroke (RR 0.83, 0.75–0.92), unstable angina (RR 0.75, 0.63–0.91), and composite major cardiovascular events (RR 0.74, 0.67–0.81). Statins increased statistically significantly relative and absolute risks of myopathy (RR 1.08, 1.01–1.15; Risk difference [RD] 13, 2–24 per 10,000 person‐years); renal dysfunction (RR 1.12, 1.00–1.26; RD 16, 0–36 per 10,000 person‐years); and hepatic dysfunction (RR 1.16, 1.02–1.31; RD 8, 1–16 per 10,000 person‐years). The drug‐level network meta‐analyses showed that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were most effective in reducing CVD events while atorvastatin appeared to have the best safety profile.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free