Clinical trials of behavioural interventions with heterogeneous teaching subgroup effects
Abstract
Behaviour modification is often delivered to teaching subgroups. For example, experimental and control smoking cessation programmes may be given to 15 classes (subgroups) with 10 (otherwise independent) individuals. We present general statistical tests and power estimates to compare continuous outcomes from two interventions in settings where the magnitude of teaching subgroup heterogeneity, number of subgroups and subgroup size can differ between intervention arms. An application is made to data from a trial to reduce disease-transmitting sexual behaviour. The statistical impact of teaching subgroup heterogeneity effect increases as the (a) number of participants in a subgroup increases, and (b) ratio of 'averaged experimental and control subgroup effect variance' to study subject variance increases. If plausible levels of subgroup teaching effect heterogeneity are ignored, the true sizes of tests with nominal 0.05 two-sided type I errors range from 0.055 to 0.47, while when planning studies, estimated sample sizes are only 11.1-95.2 per cent of the true requirements.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials
- Efficacy of personalized psychological interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effects of Lifestyle Interventions That Include a Physical Activity Component in Class II and III Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis
- Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar depression in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.