Effect of long-term prophylactic treatment on survival after myocardial infarction
Abstract
Survivors of the acute phase of a myocardial infarction still have an increased risk of dying, primarily due to causes directly attributable to their coronary heart disease. This review of randomized clinical trials of various interventions with the potential to prolong life in these patients is an attempt to answer a vitally important question. What, if anything, can be done to improve the long-term prognosis in patients who have survived the initial one or two weeks after suffering an acute myocardial infarction? Seven classes of intervention are considered: anticoagulants, platelet-active drugs, lipid-lowering regimens, antiarrhythmic agents, physical exercise, calcium antagonists and beta-blockers. So far only beta-blockers have been shown to have a favorable effect on long-term survival. Many of the trials reviewed had design limitations; in particular, the sample size was often too small for the results to be conclusive.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials
- Efficacy of personalized psychological interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effects of Lifestyle Interventions That Include a Physical Activity Component in Class II and III Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis
- Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar depression in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.