Evidence Hub

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Severe Isolated Tricuspid Regurgitation: The Tri.Fr Randomized Clinical Trial

E. Donal, J. Dreyfus, G. Leurent, A. Coisne, P. Leroux, Anne Ganivet, C. Sportouch, Y. Lavie-Badie et al.

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2024

300 participants · 135 citations

Abstract

Importance

Correction of tricuspid regurgitation using tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) in addition to guideline-directed optimized medical therapy (OMT) may improve clinical outcomes.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of T-TEER + OMT vs OMT alone in patients with severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized (1:1) trial evaluating T-TEER + OMT vs OMT alone in adult patients with severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation. The trial was conducted at 24 centers in France and Belgium (March 2021 to March 2023; latest follow-up in April 2024).

Intervention

Patients were randomized to T-TEER + OMT or OMT alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite clinical end point at 1 year comprising change in New York Heart Association class, change in patient global assessment, or occurrence of major cardiovascular events. Tricuspid regurgitation severity was the first of 6 secondary outcomes analyzed in a hierarchical closed-testing procedure, including Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, patient global assessment, and a composite outcome of all-cause death, tricuspid valve surgery, KCCQ score improvement, or time to hospitalization for heart failure.

Results

Of 300 enrolled patients (mean age, 78 [SD, 6] years, 63.7% women), 152 were allocated to T-TEER + OMT and 148 to OMT alone. At 1 year, 109 patients (74.1%) in the T-TEER + OMT group had…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free