Evidence Hub

Non-conventional pharmacological agents for the treatment of bipolar disorder: Α systematic review of the evidence

Fountoulakis KN, Balaris D, Nikolaou V, Νimatoudis J

Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki, 2016

Abstract

Bipolar disorder (BD) has a complex and variable clinical picture which is characterized by many different phacets and phases and as a result its therapeutical options are also complex and often unsatisfactory. Typically the so-called "mood stabilizers" are used in the treatment of BD and in this class lithium and specific antiepileptics are included. The present study aimed to systematically review the literature concerning the presence of randomized double blind clinical trials of 'non conventional' pharmaceutical treatment options. The present systematic review utilized the PRISMA method and searched the MEDLINE through January 1st 2015 with the use of appropriate key words. In order to identify randomized controlled trials- RCTs a combination of the words "bipolar", "manic", "mania", "manic depression" and "manic depressive" with "randomized" was used. Webpages with lists of trials were also searched including http://clinicaltrials.gov and http://www.clinicalstudyresults.org as well as the official webpages of all pharma companies with products marketed in the treatment of BD. The reference lists of various review papers were also searched. The MEDLINE was searched with the combination of the words "guidelines" or "algorithms" with "mania", "manic", "bipolar", "manicdepressive" or "manic depression" in order to identify articles with treatment guidelines. The reference list of these articles were also scanned. From 3,284 papers which were initially traced, only 47 papers…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free