Evidence Hub

Deep learning-assisted colonoscopy images for prediction of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer

Cai Y, Chen X, Chen J, Liao J, Han M, Lin D, Hong X, Hu H et al.

Surgical endoscopy, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability is a major predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors of colorectal cancer. However, routine testing has not been uniformly implemented due to cost and resource constraints.

METHODS: We developed and validated a deep learning-based classifiers to detect mismatch repair-deficient status from routine colonoscopy images. We obtained the colonoscopy images from the imaging database at Endoscopic Center of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Colonoscopy images from a prospective trial (Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade by toripalimab with or without celecoxib in mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high locally advanced colorectal cancer) were used to test the model.

RESULTS: A total of 5226 eligible images from 892 tumors from the consecutive patients were utilized to develop and validate the deep learning model. 2105 colorectal cancer images from 306 tumors were randomly selected to form model development dataset with a class-balanced approach. 3121 images of 488 proficient mismatch repair tumors and 98 deficient mismatch repair tumors were used to form the independent dataset. The model achieved an AUROC of 0.948 (95% CI 0.919-0.977) on the test dataset. On the independent validation dataset, the AUROC was 0.807 (0.760-0.854), and the NPV in was 94.2% (95% CI 0.918-0.967). On the prospective trial dataset, the model identified 29 tumors among the 33…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free