Evidence Hub

Analgesic efficacy of meloxicam vs ibuprofen on pain after third molar surgery in adult patients. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Falcón-Perez R, Pradenas-Loaiza V, Bertrán-Delgado C, Aguilera F, Kunstmann-Camino J

Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2026

68 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: This randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen compared to meloxicam in patients undergoing third molar extraction.

Material and methods: Sixty-eight patients who had been indicated for the extraction of both a maxillary (semi-erupted or fully erupted crown) and mandibular third molar (Class I, Position A, and Class I, Position B, according to Pell and Gregory's classification) were randomly assigned to receive either meloxicam (7.5 mg every 12 hours, n = 34) or ibuprofen (400 mg every 8 hours, n = 34) following a single surgical procedure. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). All outcome measures were recorded during the first seven consecutive postoperative hours, and subsequently at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Addition, the presence or absence of adverse effects was recorded.

Results: In this clinical trial, a total of 68 patients (mean age 24.7 years) completed the study in this clinical trial, and no patients were lost to follow-up. The results showed lower pain intensity in the ibuprofen-treated group at all evaluated time points, except at 72 hours; however, statistically significant differences were observed only at the 2-hour mark (p < 0.05). Both groups exhibited a sustained decrease in pain from 24 hours postoperatively onward (VAS < 2). Only two cases of mild dizziness were reported in the ibuprofen group.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 68 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free