Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesic treatment options in patients with rheumatoid arthritis related pain

Lautenschlager C, Stropes A, Smith A, Knell ME, Sperry M

Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2025

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by joint destruction and inflammation. Persistent pain is a common symptom, often impacting quality of life, physical function, and mental health. Despite its prevalence, limited guidance exists for managing chronic rheumatoid arthritis-related pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various analgesic therapies for managing rheumatoid arthritis-related pain symptoms.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted from database inception through November 7, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohorts reporting pain outcomes in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pain score data was stratified by scale (5-point, 10-point, 100-point) and analyzed using a random-effects model.

Results: Twenty-six studies covering 52 treatment regimens were included. Etodolac demonstrated significant pain reduction on a 5-point scale (200 mg: 3.24; 95% CI: 2.86 to 3.63; p < 0.001; 300 mg: 3.35; 95% CI: 2.96 to 3.74; p = 0.00). Piroxicam also showed benefit (20 mg: 3.35; 95% CI: 2.91 to 3.78; p < 0.001). On the 10-point scale, only extracorporeal shock wave therapy significantly reduced pain (3.36; 95% CI: 2.25 to 4.48; p < 0.001). Celecoxib (Celbesta) (200 mg BID) was most effective in the 100-point subgroup (1.73; 95% CI: 1.32 to 2.15; p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was high (I² =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free