Evidence Hub

Comparative Efficacy of Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Depression: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Mishra A, Bonga KN, Mishra BR, Srinivasan A, Maiti R, Hota D

Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026

7,438 participants

Abstract

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a highly prevalent but under-reported and undertreated disorder that affects mothers and infants alike. The management of PPD has to be thoughtfully catered to limit the exposure of infants to harmful drugs. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions for the prevention and treatment of PPD. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases and clinical trial registries to find studies to be included, and data were extracted. Random effects Bayesian NMA was performed using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. A network graph was built, the rank probability of each treatment was determined, and the surface under the cumulative rank probability curve was calculated. The risk of bias assessment, including publication bias, was assessed. Data from 54 studies, including 7,438 participants, were included for this NMA. No pharmacological intervention demonstrated robust superiority over placebo for the treatment of PPD, though wide credible intervals (CrI) and limited sample sizes preclude definitive conclusions. Trazodone (-1.6; 95% CrI: -2.7 to -0.41) and diphenhydramine (-1.4; 95% CrI: -2.5 to -0.20) are the two treatments that showed an efficacy superior to placebo in the prevention of PPD as seen by symptom severity scores. There was no publication bias, as observed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Based on single small trials, trazodone and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,438 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free