Evidence Hub

A phase II study evaluating the preventive effect of topical hydrocortisone for capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (T-CRACC study)

Iimura Y, Baba K, Furukawa N, Ishibashi M, Sasuga C, Ahiko Y, Monma S, Sakuyama N et al.

International journal of clinical oncology, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Background: Topical steroids may help prevent capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in patients with colorectal cancer, as inflammation is involved in anti-tumor agent-induced hand-foot syndrome development. We assessed the preventive efficacy of medium-class topical corticosteroids for capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Methods: This open-label, single-arm, single-center phase II study included patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine + oxaliplatin. Prophylactic topical hydrocortisone butyrate (0.1%) was applied to the palms and soles from day 1 of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 2 hand-foot syndrome incidence within four cycles. Secondary endpoints were the time to onset and incidence of each hand-foot syndrome grade, dose reduction, schedule delay, hand-foot syndrome-induced discontinuation, and other adverse events.

Results: Fifty patients were enrolled; three were excluded. Among the 47 included (median age = 54.5 years), 100% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 36.1% were male, and 95.7% had pathological stage III disease. Hand-foot syndrome induced dose reduction, schedule delay, and discontinuation were required in 0, 2, and 0 patients, respectively, with a median relative capecitabine dose intensity of 100% within four cycles. Grade ≥ 2 hand-foot syndrome incidence during the cycles was 6.4%. Time to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free