Evidence Hub

Prophylactic effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using cumulative logistic regression

Xie L, Li Z, Huang Y, Du X, Chen X

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025

5,436 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Most of the previous meta-analyses examining the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on preventing heterotopic ossification (HO) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) have separately analyzed Brooker's classification I, II, III, and IV which may misrepresent their ordinal nature. We therefore applied a Bayesian network meta-regression that incorporates the ordinal nature of Brooker's classification to more robustly assess NSAID efficacy and determine the optimal regimen.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Cumulative regressions were conducted for ordinal variants to generate Napierian Logarithm odds ratios (lnOR) and the standard error of lnOR (selnOR) for each study. Subsequently these data were used to conduct Bayesian network meta-analysis and further network meta-regression to generate pairwise ORs, showing pairwise effect sizes (ESs).

Results: 17 studies (5436 patients,14 regimens) were eligible. In the raw data analysis, celecoxib 400 mg/d, etoricoxib 90 mg/d, ibuprofen 1200 mg/d, indomethacin 75 mg/d, indomethacin 100 mg/d, indomethacin 150 mg/d, meloxicam 7.5 mg/d, meloxicam 15 mg/d, and naproxen 750 mg/d were conspicuously effective (OR: 0.048 ~ 0.351) compared with placebo. The ESs were comparable among these regimens except for ibuprofen 1200 mg/d, which was inferior to indomethacin 100 mg/d (OR = 0.382, 95%CI: 0.171 to 0.887) and indomethacin 150 mg/d (OR = 0.136,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,436 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free