Evidence Hub

Anti-oxidative stress therapies reduce chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Salama M, Barnes D, Georghiou A, Murad M, Almalki S, Ahmed Z, Openshaw MR, Palles C et al.

2025

100 participants

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major side-eaect of many commonly used cancer drugs, aaecting up to 90% of patients treated with oxaliplatin. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine if any pharmacological agents can prevent or reduce oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for RCTs published before March 2025 that included patients with CRC who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and had peripheral neuropathy quantified using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Meta-analysis was performed for agents tested in three or more RCTs with a minimum combined sample size of 100 patients.

Results: 20 studies were included with a median sample size of 61 (range 14-2450). Meta-analysis was used for two treatments. Anti-oxidative stress treatments were not associated with reduced incidence of grade ≥2 OIPN when assessed mid-treatment but were associated with a significant reduction of grade ≥2 OIPN at the end of treatment (OR:0.04, 95%CI:0.01-0.12; p<0.00001). No reduction of grade ≥2 OIPN was observed for Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ infusions. 35% of studies had potential high risk of bias and 45% of studies showed low risk of bias.

Conclusions: Whilst the existing published RCTs included small numbers of patients, the meta-analysis indicates that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free