Evidence Hub

Safety and efficacy of chemoprevention for familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tustumi F, Park A, Nakamura ET, de Melo Viana TC, Lisboa EN, de Almeida Leite RM, Araujo SEA, Usón PLS et al.

Annals of coloproctology, 2026

985 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: Familial adenomatous polyposis is a hereditary condition that predisposes individuals to colorectal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies for reducing polyp number, burden, and size in individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Randomized trials assessing the effects of pharmacological interventions on polyp number, polyp burden, and polyp size were included, and adverse events were also analyzed.

Results: Sixteen studies (n=985) met the inclusion criteria. The mean participant age was 38±8.3 years, with a mean follow-up of 14.6±15.8 months. Of these studies, 62.5% focused on colorectal polyps, 18.8% on rectal polyps, 18.8% on duodenal polyps, and 12.5% addressed both colorectal and duodenal polyps. Pharmacological interventions were associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in the number of polyps (Hedges g, -0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.08 to -0.05) and in average polyp size (Hedges g, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.04). However, no significant reduction in overall polyp burden was observed (Hedges g, -1.07; 95% CI, -2.21 to 0.06). In subgroup analyses, nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors produced a large reduction in polyp burden (Hedges g, -2.72; 95% CI, -3.28 to -2.16), while metformin also demonstrated benefit in a single study (Hedges g, -1.06; 95% CI, -1.86 to -0.27). Adverse…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 985 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free