Evidence Hub

Randomized Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide versus Oral Cyclophosphamide with Celecoxib for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Gupta Rohan, Cristea Mihaela, Frankel Paul, Ruel Christopher, Chen Chen, Yingyu Wang, Morgan Robert, Leong Lucille et al.

Cancer Treatment and Research Communications, 2019

52 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Background: Oral metronomic chemotherapy, which has low toxicity, has demonstrated promising anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic properties that may lead to prolonged progression-free survival and improved response rates in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). These effects may be enhanced by the co-administration of anti-angiogenic agents. Methods: We conducted a randomized phase II clinical trial to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of oral metronomic cyclophosphamide (CTX) alone and with the anti-angiogenic drug celecoxib in patients with gynecological malignancies. 52 patients were randomly assigned to two treatments arms: 50 mg oral CTX daily alone (Arm A) or with 400 mg celecoxib twice daily (Arm B). The primary endpoint was response rate. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. Results: In Arm A (n=26), 3 patients (12%) had stable disease > 6 months and 1 (4%) had a partial response. In Arm B, 5 (19%) had stable disease > 6 months and 1 patient (4%) had a partial response. There were no significant between-group differences in overall survival (9.69 months [95% CI 3.84–13.18] vs. 12.55 months [6.67–17.61]) or in median time to treatment failure (1.84 months [1.68–2.76] vs. 1.92 months [1.64–5.22]). The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Conclusions: Oral metronomic CTX has activity with no major toxicities in heavily pretreated recurrent gynecological cancers and may be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free