Evidence Hub

Mandibular Class II Furcation Defect Treatment: Effects of the Addition of Platelet Concentrates to Open Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Troiano G, Laino L, Dioguardi M, Giannatempo G, Lo Muzio L, Lo Russo L

Journal of periodontology, 2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve the efficacy and outcomes of regenerative therapy for furcation defects, the use of platelet concentrates (PCs) in addition to open flap debridement (OFD) has been investigated. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate whether mandibular Class II furcation defects treated with the addition of PC to OFD heal with a significant improvement in the following: 1) horizontal clinical attachment level (HCAL); 2) vertical clinical attachment level (VCAL); 3) probing depth (PD); and 4) level of gingival margin (LGM).

METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EBSCO Library, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and SCOPUS) were searched for randomized clinical trials to address the use of PCs in combination with OFD compared with a control group without PCs for the treatment of mandibular Class II furcation defects in humans and to provide data on the above reported outcome measures. The results of selected studies were converted to mean difference and standard error and interpolated using the inverse of variance test. Heterogeneity was investigated using both the Higgins index and the Q test.

RESULTS: Of 254 articles screened, only 11 were read in full text, and three of these were included in the meta-analysis. The addition of PCs to OFD revealed a small improvement in the following: 1) HCAL (mean difference, 1.36 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 to 1.65); 2) VCAL (mean difference, 1.54 mm; 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.85); and 3) PD (mean difference,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free