Evidence Hub

Evidence-based assessment of tooth-colored restorations in proximal lesions of primary molars

Toh SL, Messer LB

Pediatric dentistry, 2007

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was, using evidence-based dentistry, to compare the successes of glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified GIC (RmGIC), composite resin (CR), and polyacid-modified composite resin (PAMCR) in primary molar proximal lesions.

METHODS: The PICOT question was: P: in primary molar proximal lesions; I: does the use of 1 material (GIC, RmGIC, CR, or PAMCR); C: compared with the remaining materials; O (Outcome): result in higher success rates; T: when followed for at least 1 year? Relevant articles (256) were identified from databases then sieved by titles, abstracts, and full texts. Following exclusions, 36 dinical trials-including 25 randomized clinical trials (RCTs)-remained. Extracted data were meta-analyzed.

RESULTS: GIC restorations had a significantly (P.05): (1) GIC (6 studies)=65+/-34%; (2) RmGIC (3 studies)=93+/-7%; (3) CR (7 studies)=85+/-12%; and (4) PAMCR (8 studies)=90+/-10%.

CONCLUSIONS: Few articles were available to determine the best material. Recognizing material improvements since 1990, earlier data may be noncomparable. RmGIC had the highest success rates, but fewest studies and fewest restorations; only one product was assessable. Prospective RCTs should be of at least 5 years' duration to determine correctly the success rate of Class II restorations in primary molars.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free