Evidence Hub

Medications for adults with type 2 diabetes: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis

Kai-Lei Nong, Britta Tendal Jeppesen, Qingyang Shi, T. Agoritsas, G. Guyatt, H. White, Yiyuan Gao, Arnav Agarwal et al.

British medical journal, 2025

493 participants · 39 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective To provide up-to-date evidence on key benefits, harms, and uncertainties regarding medications for adults with type 2 diabetes. Design Living systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), using frequentist random effects and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) approaches. Updates are planned at least two times a year. Data sources Medline and Embase, searched up to 31 July 2024 for the current iteration. Study selection Randomised controlled trials of at least 24 weeks comparing one or more medications with standard treatment, placebo, or each other. Results The systematic review and NMA includes 493 168 participants from 869 trials (adding 53 trials since October 2022) reporting data for 13 drug classes (63 drugs) and 26 outcomes of interest. Regarding benefits, moderate to high certainty evidence confirms the well established cardiovascular and kidney benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and finerenone (the last for patients with established chronic kidney disease). The most effective drugs in reducing body weight were tirzepatide (mean difference (MD) −8.63 kg (95% confidence interval −9.34 to −7.93); moderate certainty) and orforglipron (MD −7.87 kg (−10.24 to −5.50); low certainty), followed by eight other GLP-1RAs (high to moderate certainty). Absolute benefits of medications vary substantially depending on the baseline risk of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 493 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free