Evidence Hub

Risk for Cancer With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Dual Agonists : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Albert Ko, Yu-Cheng Chang, F. Bahar, Tsu-Hsien Wang, Nutchapon Xanthavanij, Chun-Chiao Yu, R. Hsieh, Ya-See Xin et al.

Annals of Internal Medicine, 2025

94 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and overweight or obesity, but their association with cancer is unclear.

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk for obesity-related cancer associated with GLP-1RAs.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to August 2025.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized placebo-controlled trials reporting any of the following cancer outcomes: thyroid, pancreatic, colorectal, gastric, esophageal, liver, gallbladder, breast, ovarian, endometrial, or kidney cancer; multiple myeloma; or meningioma.

DATA EXTRACTION

Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The review included 48 trials involving 94 245 participants. GLP-1RAs probably have little or no effect on risk for thyroid cancer (OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.82 to 2.31]; 1 fewer to 9 more cases per 10 000 patients treated), pancreatic cancer (OR, 0.84 [CI, 0.53 to 1.35]; 9 fewer to 6 more per 10 000), breast cancer (OR, 0.95 [CI, 0.60 to 1.49]; 10 fewer to 12 more per 10 000), or kidney cancer (OR, 1.12 [CI, 0.78 to 1.60]; 5 fewer to 13 more per 10 000) (moderate certainty). GLP-1RAs may have little or no effect on colorectal, esophageal,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 94 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free