Evidence Hub

Comparative effects of glucose-lowering agents on endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes: A network meta-analysis

Hayeon Kim, Cheol Ung Choi, Kiyon Rhew, Jiwon Park, Y. Lim, M. Kim, Kyungim Kim

Atherosclerosis, 2024

2,065 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite accumulating evidence on the potential of glucose-lowering agents (GLAs) to prevent cardiovascular events, the comparative effects of GLAs on vascular function remain unclear. This study utilized validated indicators such as flow-mediated dilation (FMD; positive value favors) and pulse wave velocity (PWV; negative value favors) to uncover the comparative effects of GLAs on vascular function.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of GLAs on FMD or PWV with placebo or other GLAs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were searched through PubMed and Embase. The frequentist method of network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using a random effects model, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The NMA included 38 RCTs with 2,065 patients. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2Is) had significantly more positive effects on FMD improvement and PWV reduction than placebo. Thiazolidinedione (TZD) treatment resulted in significantly improved FMD compared to other GLAs as well as placebo (SMD: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.43). Both pioglitazone and rosiglitazone were discovered to have considerably more favorable effects on improving FMD and reducing PWV compared to placebo and other GLAs, as a result of the analysis incorporating each drug in the TZD class. The sensitivity analysis results corroborated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,065 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free