Evidence Hub

Glucagon-like peptide-1-based incretin agonists in obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ehab Al Mashtoub, Ali Hteit, Anthony Bedran, Janette Al Banna, C. El Hachem, Nazih Obeid, Mostafa Msheik, Mohamad Tlais et al.

World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2026

1,876 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is highly prevalent, symptomatically disabling, and lacks clearly disease-modifying pharmacotherapy. Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1-based incretin agonists-including GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs; e.g. , semaglutide) and the dual GIP/GLP-1 RA tirzepatide-induce substantial weight loss and favorable cardiometabolic effects and have recently been evaluated in obese HFpEF populations.

AIM

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1–based incretin agonists (including GLP-1 RAs and the dual GIP/GLP-1 RA tirzepatide) in patients with obesity-related HFpEF and to quantify their effects through meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to October 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating GLP-1–based incretin agonist therapy in adults with HFpEF and obesity. Outcomes included health status [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS)], body weight, exercise capacity, heart failure events, and safety. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for KCCQ-CSS and percentage body weight change.

RESULTS

Three RCTs (n = 1876) were included in quantitative synthesis: STEP-HFpEF (n = 529), STEP-HFpEF DM (n = 616), and SUMMIT (n = 731). GLP-1-based incretin agonist therapy significantly improved health status, with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,876 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free