Evidence Hub

The Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

X. Geng, Shan Zhou, Xiaoyan Zhang, Xi Liu, Xu-Guang Cheng, Lihua Jiang, Donghang Zhang

Frontiers in Surgery, 2022

593 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Background This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of celecoxib for pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared celecoxib with a placebo in term of pain control efficacy after TKA. Primary outcomes included pain scores at 24, 48, and 72 h after TKA. Secondary outcomes included the active range of motion (ROM) at 24, 48,72 h, and 7 days postoperatively, morphine consumption over 72 h after TKA, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and total blood loss after surgery. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan version 5.3. Results Five RCTs involving 593 participants were included in the study. Compared with a placebo, celecoxib significantly reduced visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest at 24 h [mean difference (MD) = −0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −1.27 to −0.17; I2 = 82%; P = 0.01], 48 h (MD = −1.51; 95% CI, −2.07 to −0.95; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001), and 72 h (MD = −1.30; 95% CI, −2.07 to −0.54; I2 = 82%; P = 0.0009) after TKA, decreased morphine consumption over postoperative 72 h (MD = −0.73; 95% CI, −0.96 to −0.51; I2 = 96%; P < 0.00001), and increased active ROM at 48 h (MD = 13.23; 95% CI, 7.79 to 18.67; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001), 72 h (MD = 6.52; 95% CI, 4.95 to 8.10; I2 = 68%; P < 0.00001), and 7 days (MD = 7.98; 95% CI, 3.64 to 12.31; I2 =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 593 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free