Evidence Hub

Anti-oxidative stress therapies prevent severe chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Salama M, Barnes D, Georghiou A, Murad M, Almalki S, Ahmed Z, Openshaw MR, Palles C et al.

Frontiers in oncology, 2025

100 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background and purpose: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major side-effect of many commonly used cancer drugs, affecting up to 90% of patients treated with oxaliplatin. This systematic review and meta-analysis analysed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine if any pharmacological agents or traditional medicines can prevent oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for RCTs published before March 2025 that included patients with CRC who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and had peripheral neuropathy quantified using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Meta-analysis was performed for agents tested in three or more RCTs with a minimum combined sample size of 100 patients.

Results: 20 studies were included in the systematic review with a median sample size of 61 (range 14-2450). Meta-analysis was conducted for two treatments: first, agents with anti-oxidative stress properties and second, Ca2+/Mg2+ infusions. Anti-oxidative stress treatments were associated with a significant reduction of grade ≥2 OIPN at the end of treatment (OR:0.04, 95%CI:0.01-0.12; p2+/Mg2+ infusions. 35% of studies had potential high risk of bias and 45% of studies showed low risk of bias.

Conclusions: Whilst the existing published RCTs included small numbers of patients, the meta-analysis indicates that anti-oxidative stress therapies can…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free