Evidence Hub

Depressive disorders: systematic review of approved psychiatric medications (2009-April 2025) and pipeline phase 3 medications

IsHak WW, Hirsch D, Renteria S, Totlani J, Murphy N, Chang T, Abdelsalam R, Salem M et al.

BMC psychiatry, 2025

8 citations

Abstract

Background: Depressive disorders remain a significant public health concern, with substantial personal, social, and economic impacts worldwide. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the psychiatric medications approved by the FDA from 2009 through early 2025, as well as investigational drugs in Phase 3 clinical trials for depressive disorders, with a focus on their mechanisms of action, indications, evidence for efficacy, dosing, and adverse effect profiles.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the FDALabel Database for FDA-approved medications for depressive disorders, using the criteria: labeling type "Human Prescription Drug," application type "NDA," and "depression" or "major depressive disorder" under "Indications and Usage." To identify medications in Phase 3 clinical trials or awaiting FDA approval, we searched the US Clinical Trials Registry with filters for condition "depression" or "major depressive disorder," trial phase "Phase III," and study dates from 01/01/2009 to 4/1/2025. Additional information on included drugs was obtained via a PubMed literature search.

Results: From 2009 through early 2025, the FDA approved 15 medications for depressive disorders, and there are currently 18 pipeline medications in Phase 3 clinical trials. Notable advancements during this period include a large number of approved and Phase 3 antidepressants with mechanisms that deviate from the monoamine hypothesis, particularly those targeting glutamatergic NMDA…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free