Evidence Hub

A bibliometric analysis and systematic review of drug repurposing against drug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens: a particular focus on Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Guo S, Li L, Zhang Q, Liu H, Yao X, Liang L, Chen C

Frontiers in microbiology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: Drug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens represent a major global health challenge. This study included a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and systematic review to evaluate drug repurposing efforts against these pathogens, with a particular focus on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Methods: We searched the Web of Science Core Collection (2001-April 2025) using the query "ESKAPE AND Drug Resistance AND Drug Repositioning" and performed bibliometric analysis with Bibliometrix (RStudio 4.3.2), VOSviewer 1.6.20, and CiteSpace 6.2R6. In parallel, a systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify non-antibiotic agents with reported activity against resistant ESKAPE pathogens.

Results: A total of 443 articles were analyzed bibliometrically, and 141 eligible studies were included in the systematic review, among which 31 focused on drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. The United States, China, and India were the leading contributors, with notable institutional collaborations. Repurposed agents such as niclosamide and mitomycin C exhibited antibacterial activity through mechanisms including membrane permeability disruption, quorum sensing inhibition, and biofilm suppression. Many agents also showed synergistic effects when combined with conventional antibiotics.

Conclusion: By integrating bibliometric mapping with systematic evidence synthesis, this study uniquely highlights both research trends and therapeutic potential in drug repurposing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free