Evidence Hub

The Safety and Efficacy of Glucosamine and/or Chondroitin in Humans: A Systematic Review

K. R. Baden, Sarah L. Hoeksema, Nathan Gibson, Divine N. Gadi, Eliya Craig, J. Draime, Stephanie M. Tubb, Aleda M. H. Chen

Nutrients, 2025

9 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Glucosamine and chondroitin are natural substances often used alone or in combination for conditions affecting the joints. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine and/or chondroitin supplementation in humans as well as to determine the common dosages used. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. Searches were performed in PubMed and Web of Science and uploaded into Covidence where two independent researchers reviewed articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Of the 2013 articles screened, 146 studies were included in our review, with nearly 60% being randomized controlled trials and most conducted in Europe, Asia, or the U.S. Most studies focused on osteoarthritis and joint pain, with over 90% of efficacy studies reporting positive outcomes and most safety studies indicating minimal or no adverse effects. Glucosamine and chondroitin were most commonly administered together at daily doses of 1500 mg and 1200 mg, respectively, and often compared to a placebo or celecoxib. Conclusions: Overall, the evidence suggests that glucosamine and chondroitin are generally effective and well-tolerated, particularly for managing osteoarthritis and joint pain. Consistent dosing strategies and favorable safety profiles across a diverse range of studies support their continued use in clinical practice, but…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free