Evidence Hub

Revisiting the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of neoplasm in patients with type 2 diabetes: new insights from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yi-Ran Wang, Zong-Lin Li, Chu Lin, Jin-Yu Zhou, Xiao-Ling Cai, F. Lv, Wen-Jia Yang, Li-Nong Ji

Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, 2025

126,232 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and the risk of neoplasm in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods Literature retrieval was conducted using databases from inception to June 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT-2i with placebo or other treatments in patients with T2D, and with reports of neoplasm events were included. Results were computed as the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 53 RCTs with 126,232 participants were included. No significant differences were found for the risk of overall neoplasm (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.19, I2 = 23%) in patients with SGLT-2i treatment compared with non-users. However, decreased risk of pulmonary neoplasm (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.99, I2 = 0.0%) was observed in SGLT-2i users compared to non-users, while increased risk of prostate neoplasm in SGLT-2i users was found (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.47, I2 = 0.0%). Conclusion Compared with non-users, the use of SGLT-2i was not associated with the risk of overall neoplasm. However, pulmonary neoplasms were less frequent in SGLT-2i users, while an increased risk of prostate neoplasm was observed in SGLT-2i users compared to non-users. Protocol registration www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42021273681. Plain Language Summary Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disease that affects 1 in 10 people worldwide, and cancer is now recognized…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 126,232 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free