Evidence Hub

Association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and aspirin with colorectal cancer incidence in older adults

Zaman FY, Orchard SG, Polekhina G, Gibbs P, Bernstein WB, Macrae F, Tie J, Millar J et al.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025

19 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: The relationship between aspirin, and/or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in older adults is uncertain. This study investigated the association between non-aspirin NSAIDs (NA-NSAIDs) use, alone or combined with aspirin, on CRC incidence in older adults.

Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) randomized controlled trial data and its observational continuation, ASPREE-XT (median follow-up, 8.4 years [IQR: 7.2-9.6]). NA-NSAID exposure was ascertained by self-report and medical record review at baseline, for all ASPREE participants, and for Australian participants, via linkage to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). CRC was an adjudicated secondary endpoint of ASPREE. We investigated the association between NA-NSAID use alone, and in combination with randomized aspirin use, on the incidence of CRC in time-to-event analyses.

Results: Of 19 114 ASPREE participants, 2713 (14%) reported NA-NSAID use at baseline. NA-NSAID use was associated with a reduced incidence of CRC (HRNA-NSAID use: Yes vs No = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.98). This association between NA-NSAIDs and CRC was not modified by aspirin (P-value for interaction term of 0.81). When assessing NA-NSAID use over 2 years post-randomization in Australian participants who consented to the use of PBS data (n = 13 725), a similar reduction in CRC risk was observed (HRHigh NA-NSAID use vs None = 0.52, 95% CI =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free