Evidence Hub

A proof-of-concept, Phase 2 clinical trial of the gastrointestinal safety of a hydrogen sulfide-releasing anti-inflammatory drug

Wallace JL, Nagy P, Feener TD, Allain T, Ditrói T, Vaughan DJ, Muscara MN, de Nucci G et al.

British journal of pharmacology, 2020

94 citations

Abstract

Background and purpose: ATB-346 is a hydrogen sulfide (H2 S)-releasing anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug. Animal studies demonstrated negligible gastrointestinal (GI) damage despite marked inhibition of COX activity and significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. In humans, ATB-346 (250 mg once daily) was found to inhibit COX to the same extent as naproxen (550 mg twice daily).

Experimental approach: Two hundred forty-four healthy volunteers completed a 2-week, double-blind study, taking either ATB-346 (250 mg once daily) or naproxen (550 mg twice daily), with upper GI ulceration being examined endoscopically.

Key results: Forty-two per cent of the subjects taking naproxen developed at least one ulcer (≥3-mm diameter), while only 3% of the subjects taking ATB-346 developed at least one ulcer. The two drugs produced comparable and substantial (>94%) suppression of COX activity. Subjects in the naproxen group developed more ulcers per subject than ATB-346-treated subjects and a greater incidence of larger ulcers (≥5-mm diameter). The incidence of dyspepsia, abdominal pain, gastro-oesophageal reflux, and nausea was lower with ATB-346 than with naproxen. Subjects treated with ATB-346 had significantly higher plasma levels of H2 S than those treated with naproxen.

Conclusions and implications: This Phase 2B study provides unequivocal evidence for a marked reduction of GI toxicity of the H2 S-releasing analgesic/anti-inflammatory drug, ATB-346, as compared to the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free