Evidence Hub

Pathways and risks of pesticides, microplastics, and emerging contaminants in Ghanaian drinking water: a systematic review

Bashiru Mahama, G. Abubakar, S. Cobbina, A. Abubakari, M. M. Braimah, Ibrahim Chimsi

Water Quality Research Journal, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT This systematic review examines the pathways and risks associated with pesticides, microplastics, and emerging contaminants in drinking water sources in Ghana. The current review employed the PRISMA approach to synthesize peer-reviewed literature published between 2020 and 2025. It identifies the routes, levels, and sources of contaminants, as well as their related public health and environmental impacts. A total of 1,160 articles were initially identified, and 450 were shortlisted after a careful screening process. Of these, 39 articles were selected for final inclusion. The key findings showed contaminants enter water sources through runoff from agricultural activities, industrial effluent, and poor waste disposal, presenting a significant health risk. The quantitative data showed widespread contamination by pesticides (0.5–18 μg/L), microplastics (12–547 particles/L), pharmaceuticals, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), with significant health implications, such as hormonal disruptions, antibiotic resistance, endocrine disorders, neurological problems, carcinogenic effects, and developmental impairment in children. The presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals and PFAS in 30% of tap water samples further indicates contamination after treatment. These findings highlight for an urgent comprehensive risk assessment, enforced policy action, and area-specific interventions to provide clean drinking water and protect public health in Ghana.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free