Evidence Hub

How microplastics influence health risk pathways in urban water systems? integrated binary classification, machine learning and structural equation modeling approach

Rehman H, Maryem B, Debik E, Manav-Demir N, Erkan HS, Hassan M, Engin GO, Ulucan-Altuntas K et al.

Environmental geochemistry and health, 2026

Abstract

Microplastic contamination in urban water systems poses emerging risks to human health, yet integrated frameworks linking sources, exposure pathways, and health outcomes remain limited. This study develops an integrated machine learning-Bayesian-structural equation modeling framework to quantify and predict microplastic-driven health risks across urban water systems. A systematic literature review screened 1,742 records, of which 47 studies met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Here, we integrate machine learning, Bayesian inference, and structural equation modeling (SEM) to resolve microplastic contamination dynamics and associated health impacts across urban water systems. The synthesized dataset incorporated environmental source characteristics, contamination indicators, exposure metrics, biological response proxies, and health-related outcomes to support integrated modeling and risk prediction. Random Forest clustering identified six distinct contamination-health regimes (R2 = 0.73), including industrial discharge-dominated, wastewater-associated, stormwater-influenced, mixed urban residential, landfill/leachate-associated, and low-contamination background conditions. Random Forest regression predicted health impairment with high accuracy (R2 = 0.84; RMSE = 3.77). Additionally, microplastic health risk is governed by coupled environmental pressures, exposure pathways, and biological responses rather than isolated factors. Binary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free