Evidence Hub

Polystyrene microplastics and hepatic fibrosis-related indices in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis with experimental validation

Sun Y, Xu X, Sun G, Li J, Yu B, Wang Y, Zhang K, Xia F et al.

Particle and fibre toxicology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Microplastics (MPs) are emerging environmental contaminants with potential hepatotoxicity, yet direct epidemiological evidence linking internal MP exposure to liver injury is scarce, particularly in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In this cross-sectional study nested within the METAL2 cohort, we aimed to characterize blood microplastic profiles in patients with T2D and to determine whether specific MP polymers are associated with hepatic steatosis and fibrosis risk, with experimental validation of the identified polymer.

Results: In patients with T2D, multiple MP polymers were detectable in blood, with polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyamide 66 (PA66), and polystyrene (PS) being the most prevalent. Although PVC constituted the largest proportion of total MP burden, PS showed the most consistent nominal positive liver-related signal in the human analyses, including higher levels in participants with elevated fibrosis risk and higher FIB-4 and ALT in the highest exposure quartile. Experimental validation in diabetic mice demonstrated that PS microplastics markedly exacerbated hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and collagen deposition, leading to overt liver fibrosis. Mechanistically, PS-MPs exposure disrupted hepatic lipid homeostasis and concurrently activated the NLRP3 inflammasome and the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway, promoting inflammatory amplification and hepatic stellate cell activation.

Conclusion: This integrated human and experimental study provides…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free