Evidence Hub

Human Exposure to Micro- and Nanoplastics and Their Potential Neurological Implications: A Systematic Review of Emerging Evidence

Parihar P, Rana S, Sutar RF, Agrawal A, Singh V, Pandey MK

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

The growing prevalence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the environment elicits concerns about their possible impact on human neurological health. Although studies on animals have suggested neurotoxic effects, evidence from humans is still scarce. This systematic review gathers existing human data to assess the presence, types, detection techniques, and neurological consequences of MNPs in different biological matrices. A comprehensive review was performed on peer-reviewed research concentrating on human studies that report the detection of MNPs in biological tissues and fluids. Four qualifying studies were identified: one clinical observational study, two cadaveric analyses, and one quasi-experimental trial. The data collected encompassed demographics, detection methods, types and concentrations of polymers, biological matrices examined, and neurological biomarkers. MNPs were observed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), faeces, urine, olfactory bulbs (OBs), and in brain, liver, and kidney tissues from postmortem cases. The polymers that were reported most frequently were polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). The detection methods included micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (µFTIR), pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), laser direct infrared imaging (LDIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Although the available evidence is limited, emerging findings indicate the possible accumulation of MNPs in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free