Evidence Hub

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of SHR6508 in chinese healthy subjects: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-dose and dose-escalation phase I trial

Sheng Zhang, Hong-yi Tan, Shuang Yang, Xiao-Yan Yang, Chang Cui, Jie Huang, Guo-ping Yang

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, 2024

22 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of SHR6508 injection, a new calcimimetic agent, in healthy Chinese subjects following single dose. This study utilized a placebo-controlled, single-dose, and dose-escalation design with four dose groups (0.5 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg). The trial started with a low dose and continuing to the next dose after completion of the out-of-group safety assessment of the previous dose group. Blood samples were collected at 15 time points to measure pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Safety was assessed by therapeutic emergency adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and physical examination. Of the 22 subjects who completed this study, 16 received SHR6508 Injection and 6 received placebo. In the 0.5–5 mg group, t1/2z was 8.8 h–28.3 h. Cmax and AUC increased proportionally with dose. PD results showed that SHR6508 dose dependently decreased iPTH and blood calcium levels in subjects in the 0.5–5-mg dose range; blood phosphorus levels in subjects in the 5 mg group tended to be elevated compared to those in the placebo group. Twenty-one TEAEs occurred in 12 subjects (54.5%), and no serious or severe TEAEs occurred. The overall safety and tolerability of a single intravenous dose of 0.5–5 mg SHR6508 in healthy subjects was favorable, exhibiting dose-dependent PK and PD properties.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free