Evidence Hub

Microplastic Contamination of Seafood Intended for Human Consumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evangelos D. Danopoulos, Lauren C. Jenner, Maureen Twiddy, Jeanette M. Rotchell

Environmental Health Perspectives, 2020

299 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microplastics (MPs) have contaminated all compartments of the marine environment including biota such as seafood; ingestion from such sources is one of the two major uptake routes identified for human exposure.OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the levels of MP contamination in seafood and to subsequently estimate the annual human uptake.METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from launch (1947, 1974, and 1900, respectively) up to October 2020 for all studies reporting MP content in seafood species.Mean, standard deviations, and ranges of MPs found were collated.Studies were appraised systematically using a bespoke risk of bias (RoB) assessment tool.RESULTS: Fifty studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis.Evidence was available on four phyla: mollusks, crustaceans, fish, and echinodermata.The majority of studies identified MP contamination in seafood and reported MP content <1 MP=g, with 26% of studies rated as having a high RoB, mainly due to analysis or reporting weaknesses.Mollusks collected off the coasts of Asia were the most heavily contaminated, coinciding with reported trends of MP contamination in the sea.According to the statistical summary, MP content was 0-10:5 MPs=g in mollusks, 0:1-8:6 MPs=g in crustaceans, 0-2:9 MPs=g in fish, and 1 MP=g in echinodermata.Maximum annual human MP uptake was estimated to be close to 55,000 MP particles.Statistical,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free