Microplastics removal from aquatic environment by coagulation: Selecting the best coagulant based on variables determined from a systematic review
Abstract
The present study was carried out in the two phases of systematic review and experimental research. First, for the systematic review phase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed as electronic databases were utilized to find research articles distributed up to March 5, 2021, related to the removal of microplastics by coagulation. In total, 104 publications were found, of which 14 were reviewed for deriving the variables and research design. Then, in the experimental phase, the experiment was carried out based on the variables derived from the systematic phase for three microplastic types (polyethylene, polystyrene, and polyamide) and five coagulants (polyaluminum chloride (PAC), ferric chloride (FeCl 3 ), aluminum chloride (AlCl 3 ), alum (Al(OH) 3 ) and aluminum sulfate (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 )) in bench scale study. The differences between removal efficiencies in terms of type, shape, concentration, and size of microplastics within the looked into article was analyzed utilizing ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test (for parametric or nonparametric analysis, respectively). The results of experimental phase show that the removal efficiency of different microplastics was significantly different, and it was equal to 65, 22, and 12% on average for PA, PS, and PE, respectively. These averages are much lower than the average removal efficiency calculated in the reviewed articles (78 and 52% for PS and PE, respectively). The removal efficiency of microplastics types by coagulants was not…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Green Chemistry: A Framework for a Sustainable Future
- Nano/micro-plastic, an invisible threat getting into the brain
- Emerging contaminants antibiotic resistance genes and microplastics in the environment: Introduction to 21 review articles published in CREST during 2018–2022
- Water Resources and Sustainable Development
- Nano- and microplastics in the workplace
- Water Enclosure and World-Literature: New Perspectives on Hydro-Power and World-Ecology
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.