Marine microplastic pollution & misinformation in the public sphere: a systematic review
Abstract
Marine microplastic pollution is a persistent global issue that has gained scientific attention for over two decades. Nevertheless, knowledge gaps remain, particularly in how inconsistencies in communicating scientific evidence can lead to misinformation. A systematic review was conducted to identify how previous research has examined miscommunication about microplastics in the public sphere. Of the 274 scientific publications identified, 15 were found eligible for inclusion in the study. These publications were analysed to establish (i) the methodologies employed to investigate microplastic communication in the public sphere, (ii) how existing information contributes to microplastic miscommunication, and (iii) what level of awareness and knowledge around microplastic pollution has been established. Our analysis revealed two primary study types: participant-based (e.g., via surveys, focus groups) and text-based studies of media content (e.g., newspapers, digital platforms). The participant-based studies showed misperceptions about impacts on human health and their pathways into the natural environment, even among well-informed or professionally involved individuals. The text-based studies revealed inexact media reporting involving scientific referencing, content accuracy, representation of microplastic pollution, and sensationalist tones. The findings highlight the need for further research into the miscommunication of microplastic pollution to facilitate best practice in…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Green Chemistry: A Framework for a Sustainable Future
- Nano/micro-plastic, an invisible threat getting into the brain
- Emerging contaminants antibiotic resistance genes and microplastics in the environment: Introduction to 21 review articles published in CREST during 2018–2022
- Water Resources and Sustainable Development
- Nano- and microplastics in the workplace
- Water Enclosure and World-Literature: New Perspectives on Hydro-Power and World-Ecology
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.