Evidence Hub

Diet, Fluid, or Supplements for Secondary Prevention of Nephrolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

H. Fink, Joseph W. Akornor, P. Garimella, R. MacDonald, A. Cutting, I. Rutks, M. Monga, T. Wilt

European Urology, 2009

1,855 participants · 207 citations

Abstract

Context Although numerous trials have evaluated efficacy of diet, fluid, or supplement interventions for secondary prevention of nephrolithiasis, few are included in previous systematic reviews or referenced in recent nephrolithiasis management guidelines. Objective To determine efficacy and safety of diet, fluid, or supplement interventions for secondary prevention of nephrolithiasis. Evidence acquisition Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials published January 1950 to March 2008. Sources included Medline and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Eligible trials included adults with a history of nephrolithiasis; compared diet, fluids, or supplements with control; compared relevant outcomes between randomized groups (eg, stone recurrence); had ≥3 mo follow-up; and were published in the English language. Data were extracted on participant and trial characteristics, including study methodologic quality. Evidence synthesis Eight trials were eligible (n = 1855 participants). Study quality was mixed. In two trials, water intake >2 l/d or fluids to achieve urine output >2.5 l/d reduced stone recurrence (relative risk: 0.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.19–0.80). In one trial, fewer high soft drink consumers assigned to reduced intake had renal colic than controls (34% vs 41%, p = 0.023). Content and results of multicomponent dietary interventions were heterogeneous; in one trial, fewer participants assigned increased dietary calcium, low animal protein, and low sodium had…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,855 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free