Evidence Hub

Micro- and nanoplastics in the human genitourinary system: oncological impact - a systematic review

Akpang N, Kwiatkowski J, Zapała Ł, Zapała P, Radziszewski P, Ślusarczyk A

BJU international, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically assess the prevalence, distribution, and quantitative burden of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in human tissues of the urinary tract and male reproductive organs, with particular attention to their potential oncological implications.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was performed to identify human observational studies reporting detection and/or quantification of MNPs in the urinary tract and male reproductive organs. Risk of bias was assessed in the included studies.

Results: A total of 14 cross-sectional human studies were included. MNPs were detected across all investigated tissues, including the kidney, prostate, testis, penis, ureter, and, incidentally, the urinary bladder. All studies comparing malignant and adjacent non-malignant tissues (kidney, prostate, and penis) consistently reported significantly higher microplastic concentrations, particle counts or greater polymer diversity in tumour tissue. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies with respect to analytical techniques, digestion protocols, and reporting metrics.

Conclusions: Micro- and nanoplastics are widely present in tissues of the urinary tract and male reproductive system and show consistent enrichment in urological malignancies compared with adjacent non-malignant tissue, suggesting potential…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free