Evidence Hub

Monitoring the hyporheic zone: a global review and strategic directions for improvement

da Silva Andrade D, Di Lorenzo T, Milesi SV, Hepp LU, Mugnai R

Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026

Abstract

The hyporheic zone (HZ) is a crucial interface in riverbeds that links surface and subterranean waters, supporting a unique ecological community. While recent reviews have explored theoretical and ecological aspects of HZ, this study focuses on evaluating the advances in monitoring the quality and conservation status. We conducted a global systematic review, screening 16,135 articles and retaining a final data pool of 102 peer-reviewed studies published between 1989 and 2024. We address four main areas: (i) spatial and temporal distribution, (ii) monitoring activities, (iii) methodologies employed, and (iv) the impact of legislation. Despite advances in technical knowledge, HZ monitoring efforts remain quantitatively limited. Geographically, research is highly skewed, with Europe (51.0%), Asia (21.6%), and North America (19.6%) dominating the field, while other regions are severely underrepresented. Taxonomically, studies predominantly focus on the entire invertebrate community (35.5%) or microorganisms (30.3%), whereas efficient trait-based approaches remain scarce (6.6%). Methodologically, sampling is largely confined to shallow depths (up to - 50 cm). Furthermore, the enactment of environmental legislation showed a localized, rather than global, stimulus on monitoring outputs. This study emphasizes the urgent need for standardized methodologies, integrated surface-groundwater approaches, and targeted efforts to ensure effective water resource management. Finally, we…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free