Evidence Hub

Organoids as a Tool for Assessing Drinking Water Safety and Guidelines Relevance

Coppo R, Bertone E

Preprints.org, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Ensuring access to safe drinking water is a fundamental public health priority, yet the growing diversity of contaminants demands more human-relevant toxicity assessment frameworks. Conventional models based on immortalized cell lines or sentinel species, while informative, lack the tissue complexity and inter-individual variability required to capture realistic human responses. Organoids, three-dimensional epithelial structures derived from adult or pluripotent stem cells, retain the genomic, histological, and functional characteristics of their original tissue, enabling assessment of contaminant-induced toxicity, short-term peak exposures, and inter-donor variability within a single system. This study examined whether current international drinking water guidelines remain protective or if recent organoid-based findings reveal toxicity at differing concentrations. Comparative synthesis indicates that PFAS often display organoid toxicity at concentrations above current thresholds, suggesting conservative guidelines, whereas most metals are properly regulated. However, some metals exhibit toxicity at concentrations that include levels below guideline values, highlighting the need for further investigation. Emerging contaminants, including pesticides, nanoparticles, microplastics, and endocrine disruptors, induce adverse effects at environmentally relevant concentrations, despite limited or absent regulatory limits. Integrating organoid-based toxicology with high-frequency…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free