Evidence Hub

Microplastics from disposable paper cups are enriched in the placenta and fetus, leading to metabolic and reproductive toxicity during pregnancy

Qiong Chen, Chen Peng, Haoteng Xu, Zhuojie Su, Gulimire Yilihan, Xin Wei, Yueran Shen, Chao Jiang

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 2024

4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The health implications of microplastics (MPs), especially those originating from hot drinks in disposable paper cups (DPCs), are increasingly alarming. We investigated the accumulation and metabolic and reproductive toxicological effects of MPs from DPCs filled with hot water in various tissues in a pregnant mouse model. Simulating human intake of 0.3, 3.3, and 33.3 cups daily, we found MPs exposure-induced dose-responsive harmful effects on murine fetal development and maternal physiology. MPs were detected in all 13 examined tissues, with the highest accumulation in the cecal contents, followed by significant depositions in the fetus, placenta, kidney, spleen, lung, and heart. A higher proportion of smaller MPs (90.35% < 10 μm) was identified in brain tissues. Dose-responsive changes in functional microbiome and gene pathways were observed. Moderate MPs intake of 3.3 cups daily significantly altered cecal microbiome composition and metabolic functions. The transcriptomic functional variations in maternal blood, placenta, and mammary gland underscore the significant impacts of realistic MPs exposure on metabolic and immune health and posing neurodegenerative and miscarriage risks. The benchmark dose framework analysis using tissue-specific gene biomarkers revealed safe exposure limits at 2 to 4 cups/day during pregnancy. Our results indicate selective tissue accumulation and potential metabolic and reproductive toxicities of MPs at exposure levels presumed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free