Evidence Hub

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Settled Water Turbidity for Optimizing Alum Dosage in Drinking Water Treatment

Samadhi Cooray, D. Fernando, Praveen Jeyachandran, Dr. A. Jayakodi, Prasanna Sumathipala, Salih Fousdeen, M. Nawarathne

International Conference on Advances in Information Technology, 2026

Abstract

Efficient chemical dosing is essential in drinking water treatment plants to ensure effective turbidity removal while minimizing chemical consumption and operational costs. Conventional alum dosing methods rely on manual jar tests and operator experience, which are time-consuming and often inadequate for handling rapid variations in raw water quality. Key parameters such as turbidity, pH, and electrical conductivity significantly influence the coagulation process, making accurate dosage determination a complex and dynamic challenge. This study proposes a machine learning–based approach to support optimal alum dosage selection by predicting settled water turbidity using historical treatment data. The dataset includes raw water turbidity, pH, conductivity, and applied alum dosage, which are used to train regression models capable of capturing nonlinear relationships between input parameters and treatment performance. The study used 7,975 hourly operational records collected from Ambathale Water Treatment Plant during January–December 2024, and model evaluation was performed using a time-aware 80:20 chronological train-test split. Multiple algorithms, including Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM, were explored alongside feature engineering techniques to improve model effectiveness. Experimental results demonstrate that the Random Forest model achieves superior performance, with an R² score of 0.7909, RMSE of 0.5197, and MAE of 0.3166, indicating strong…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a book / chapter, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free