Evidence Hub

Automatic vs. manual feature engineering for anomaly detection of drinking-water quality

Valerie Fehst, Huu Chuong La, Tri-Duc Nghiem, B. Mayer, Paul J. Englert, Karl-Heinz Fiebig

Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, 2018

20 citations

Abstract

This paper evaluates anomaly detection approaches for drinking-water quality. Two major machine learning techniques are compared. One is manual feature engineering with feature subset selection for dimensionality reduction. The other is automatic feature learning through a recurrent neural network. Both methods incorporate the time domain for change detection. Preliminary results show a superior performance of automatic feature learning with an F1 score of 80%. While the feature set proposed in this work out-performs naive classification with original features, it needs further analysis to reach comparable performance to the automatic approach.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free